Thursday, August 1, 2013

Inspiration from a Blind: Did George Zimmerman's Case Conform to God's Justice?

A blessed August to you from Inspiration from a Blind brought to you monthly by!

Are you just? Justice is one of the fundamental virtues of Yahweh. If you claim God as your Father, then how much are you like Him? To live up the title as a child of God, you will need to reflect His qualities, among which is justice.

Here, we will study some of the principles and ordinances Yahweh has laid out in His justice system. I will use the recent emotionally charged trial of George Zimmerman as an example to illustrate how we can apply God's justice principles to our judicial system as well as to our daily life.

To acquaint yourself with the Zimmerman case, do a search on the net. The gist of the story is: Last year on a rainy night, George Zimmerman, 28, a neighborhood watch volunteer, spotted someone walking in his gated community, acting suspiciously in his opinion. In those days, there had been break-ins in the community where the burglars were primarily African American males. Thinking that this African American man might be one of the burglars, Zimmerman followed him on foot, despite being advised to stay put by a 911 dispatcher. But this "man" was no burglar but a 17-year-old boy named Trayvon Martin who was returning from buying a bag of candy. According to Zimmerman, after he verbally confronted Martin, Martin attacked him, repeatedly punching him in the face and smashing his head against a concrete sidewalk. Zimmerman then reached to his gun and fatally shot Martin. Zimmerman claimed the killing was in self-defense, but the prosecution team claimed it was second-degree murder, for which he was charged. On July 13, the jury found Zimmerman "not guilty" of all charges. Here, we will briefly study this case in light of God's justice system.

The fundamental principles and ordinances in Yahweh's justice system are:

1) Firm evidence is required to charge and convict a person of a crime

In order to justly charge and convict someone of any crime, firm evidence is required to undeniably prove the guilt of the criminal. Under the Mosaic covenant, Yahweh required that a case be established by at least two eye witnesses to the crime (Deuteronomy 19:15). This meant if only one person witnessed a murder being committed, this sole witness' testimony would not be sufficient to charge the murderer. This ordinance helped to prevent the conviction of an innocent person.

Today, with our technological advances, it is often not necessary to have actual eye witnesses to a crime to prove a crime was committed. For example, we have video cameras that can capture an actual murder as it's being committed, as well as fingerprints and DNA to confirm the murderer's identity.

So to establish a case, we need firm evidences, whether they be actual eye witnesses or video cameras, for example, or both. This is where the prosecution team in Zimmerman's case faltered: they had no eye witness to prove that Zimmerman murdered Martin, and any circumstantial evidences they presented were more speculative than actual. In other words, they had no real evidence to charge Zimmerman of second-degree murder.

Now, how do we apply God's principle to our daily life where evidence is required to charge and convict a person? Most of us will never be involved in actual court cases, yet this principle is still applicable in everyday matters. Two ways we can apply this principle to our lives are to:

a) Confirm what we hear or what we see before believing in it or before we pass it to others. If we pass on to others whatever we hear without verifying the facts with reliable sources, that make us gossipers who spread rumors.

b) Give others the benefit of doubt. If someone accuses of your friend of wrongdoing, first ask your friend about the matter before getting upset at your friend. Hear your friend's side of the story and investigate the matter before drawing a conclusion.

2) Speak the truth

God is a God of truth who never lies, and He desires us to be people of our word. We are to speak the truth, especially when we testify at a court trial. Yahweh does not excuse those who bear false witness against others.

Under the Mosaic covenant, to prevent perjury (the deliberate giving of false testimony under oath), the false witness was severely punished. Specifically, the false witness would receive the penalty they intended for the one they falsely accuse (Deuteronomy 19:16-19).

Let's take Zimmerman's case as an example. Zimmerman was charged with second-degree murder, which carries a sentence of twenty-five years to life in prison. If a witness falsely testified in his trial and was found out by the judge, then that false witness should receive the penalty of a second-degree murder: twenty-five years to life in prison. If our government punishes false witnesses in accordance with God's laws, just imagine how many innocent people would have been spared of false accusation and a wrongful conviction.

If we claim to be sons and daughters of Yahweh, then we must be honest folks, say what we mean and mean what we say. If we are ever called to the witness stand, we have to tell nothing but the truth to the best of our ability. If we are unsure of something, then we should not claim it to be the truth.

3) Side with the truth, even if it puts you in opposition to the majority

God's Word commands, "You shall not follow a crowd to do evil; neither shall you testify in court to side with a multitude to pervert justice." (Exodus 23:2) What this ordinance means is that we should not side with the crowd when the majority is wrong. If we side with the crowd simply to be counted among the majority even though the majority is wrong, then we would pervert justice.

We should always side with the truth, even if it means that we are the only ones standing on the side of truth. We are to side with the truth even when others around us pressure us to be on their side. This takes a lot of courage, indeed. But isn't the truth worth it?

In Zimmerman's trial, the six-member jury sided with the truth, even when their verdict went against the opinion and belief of many. They were courageous to choose to stand on the truth's minority side. The truth was: Zimmerman could not be convicted of murder when there was no evidence to prove that he committed murder beyond a reasonable doubt, while the strongest circumstantial evidences support his claim of self-defense.

One juror believes in her heart that Zimmerman got away with murder but she had to acquit him because there's no evidence to convict him. The feelings of our hearts cannot be trusted, as "the heart is deceitful above all things, and it is exceedingly corrupt: who can know it?" (Jeremiah 17:9) This is why we need evidence, not emotions, to convict the right person.

4) Deliver justice to everyone, regardless of any such factors as their social status, race, or gender

Yahweh loves righteousness and justice, which are the foundation of His throne (Psalm 33:5, 89:14). Justice is fairness, and the truthful administration of what each person deserves without partiality or prejudice, whether it be at one's home, workplace, or at the court of law.

In a criminal case, justice has to be served to and by all parties involved. The prosecution has to identify the right suspect to the best of their ability and provide enough solid evidences to establish their case and charge the suspect. They should not target a suspect because of their race, age, or social status. For instance, if tragedy struck between a white man and a black man, we should not automatically assume that a crime has been committed. If a crime was indeed committed, we should not instantly assume that race was a factor or the only factor that led to the crime.

Many, if not most, believe that Zimmerman murdered Martin because Martin was African American. In other words, they claim that Zimmerman (who is Hispanic) is racist and thus targeted Martin in hatred. But what is their evidence? Zimmerman's defense team pointed out that quite contrary to the public's claim, Zimmerman mentored to African American boys, and his girlfriend and prom date in high school was an African American girl. He also openly spoke out against the police to seek justice for a homeless African American man who was physically assaulted by a white youth, the son of a police lieutenant. He went into black churches to gain supporters to get the perpetrator charged. If you ask me, these are circumstantial evidences to prove Zimmerman is not a racist.

Outside the court, we should all treat others equally. We should not stereotype a person because of their race or gender or age. For instance, if we hear of trouble at work, we should not automatically think, "That black guy must have done it," or "A woman couldn't have done it." The fact is that any person of any race, gender, or background can commit any crime.

5) Do not convict the innocent

Yahweh says, "Keep far from a false charge, and don't kill the innocent and righteous: for I will not justify the wicked." (Exodus 23:7) God does not approve of convicting the innocent or acquitting the guilty, and neither should we, if we call Him our Father.

However, from the fact that Yahweh required His people to have at least two witnesses to establish a case, we see that the sin of convicting an innocent person is more serious than the sin of acquitting (or failing to convict) the guilty. In other words, it's better to acquit the guilty rather than convict an innocent person if we cannot have evidence to support our case. To make certain we convict the right person, we need evidences to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of the suspect. If we do not have enough evidences to convict a person, then we should not do so, even if that person is guilty.

In Zimmerman's case, he was rightly acquitted by the jury of all charges because the prosecutors failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman was guilty of second-degree murder, or even manslaughter under Florida law.

Outside the courtroom in everyday matters, we should avoid "convicting" the wrong person as well. To do so, we must not draw hasty conclusions before gathering all the facts. If someone tells you that your friend is backbiting you, don't convict your friend. Ask them first. If you don't want to confront them, then don't convict them, either. If something is missing from your home, don't convict anyone of stealing it. You may have misplaced the item. If it were indeed stolen, then investigate first before confronting or convicting anyone without evidence. It all boils down to evidence.

6) Your judgment will be measured to you

If you know that you would be judged the way you wrongly judge others, would you still hastily draw conclusions in condemning others? If you would be condemned by the rash words you utter, would you still speak without thinking?

Indeed, we will be held accountable for any wrongful judgment we make about others and for any rash words we speak. Note what Jesus said:

"Don't judge, so that you won't be judged. For with whatever judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with whatever measure you measure, it will be measured to you." (Matthew 7:1-2)

"I tell you that every idle word that men speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment. For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned." (Matthew 12:36-37)

Are you absolutely certain, beyond a reasonable doubt, that George Zimmerman murdered Trayvon Martin in hatred? Can you bet with your own life that Zimmerman is guilty of murder?

The jury could not, so they pronounced this lawful verdict: Not guilty.

Evidence: this is the bottom line. If you have no undeniable proof to convict anyone, whether it be Zimmerman or your next door neighbor, then your judgment will return on your own head when Jesus Christ returns to judge all of humanity.

7) Ultimate justice lies in Yahweh's hands

If you feel that our justice system is a failure where justice has not been delivered on behalf of all victims, here's good news for you: Yahweh will bring to light every deed of humanity, good or bad, done openly or in secrecy, and will deliver the perfect judgment for all cases. No one will escape the final judgment of God. If any person sins against a fellow human being and is not justly dealt with in this lifetime, rest assured that Yahweh will deliver full justice on behalf of any and all victims. We may fail at justice, but God will not. Ultimate judgment lies in His hands. This is a great hope of all justice-seekers that we must always hold on to!

Since final judgment lies in the hands of our almighty Creator, then we should not feel defeated when we or anyone we know have been wronged and not received justice due us. In the meantime, as we wait for the day of God's justice, it is our duty right now to conform to God's justice as best we can, whether it be in the courtroom, at home, at work, or with our friends at play. We are to be just to everyone in our dealings, speak the truth and side with it, and not hastily draw conclusions regarding any person without evidence lest we commit the sin of convicting an innocent person.

Now, the concluding question regarding the Zimmerman case in light of God's justice principles is: Did George Zimmerman's case conform to God's justice? No and yes. No, because the prosecutors charged Zimmerman without having evidences to support their claim. Due to a lack of evidence, there shouldn't have been a case in the first place. However, the case concluded in accordance with God's ordinance. Under the law of God and of humanity, people are innocent until proven guilty. Zimmerman was not proven guilty, so he remains innocent. The jury therefore rightly acquitted him of all charges, and we should respect and accept their judgment.


~*~Q&A with Dr. Shirley~*~

Question: Why did the jury acquit George Zimmerman of second-degree murder and the lesser crime of manslaughter?

Answer: Simply because there is no evidence to prove that Zimmerman committed second-degree murder or manslaughter. Under Florida law, the prosecution has to prove that the suspect killed another due to hatred or spite. The prosecution for the Zimmerman trial failed to do so. They had no real evidence for a conviction of any of the crimes they charged Zimmerman of, and any circumstantial evidences they presented in the trial were weak.

For example, one circumstantial evidence the prosecution presented during the trial was the profanity George uttered on the night of the shooting, which was generally directed toward the burglars who have gotten away. The prosecution claimed that such profanity proved that Zimmerman had hatred in his heart, a cause that made him murder Martin, a boy he had never before met. But is this "evidence" more speculative than factual? As we all know, profanity is rampant nowadays. Friends curse one another to their faces. Even children use the f-word to curse their parents. Does this mean that when people curse others using profanity that they hate others with the intent to murder?

On the other hand, the strongest and most important circumstantial evidences support Zimmerman's claim of self-defense. A few of such circumstantial evidences are:

a) Zimmerman sustained bodily injuries, while Martin's body had no wounds (apart from the bullet wound). This supports Zimmerman's claim that Martin physically assaulted him and that he responded in self-defense when he shot Martin.

Imagine you hear someone screaming for help. You run in the direction of the screams and found two men: one has injuries to his head, while the other was physically unharmed. Who was likely screaming for help?

In the 911 call recordings (pieces of circumstantial evidence), screams for help were heard in the background. Who had better reason to call for help--Zimmerman, with a broken nose and a bleeding head, or Martin, with no injuries?

b) Martin's knees were soaked while Zimmerman's backside was wetter than his front side. Sanford police officer Tim Smith, the first officer on the scene of the shooting, testified at trial that Zimmerman's jacket was wetter on the back than the front, and that the back was also covered in grass. On the other hand, the pants of Martin were heavily stained and muddy on the areas of the knee and shin. All this supports Zimmerman's claim that he was lying face up on the wet ground while Martin straddled him during the physical assault. This also supported at least one witness' testimony of seeing Martin assaulting Zimmerman while mounted on top of him.

c) Vincent Di Maio, a forensic pathologist and a gunshot wound expert, testified at the trial where he explained that his medical findings support Zimmerman's claims that a) Martin was on top of him, leaning toward him when he fired the fatal shot, b) Martin punched him in the face several times, and c) Martin repeatedly bashed his head against a concrete sidewalk, as the cuts and bumps on the back of his head were consistent with his claim. Di Maio testified that such repeated blows to the head can be fatal.

Thus, Zimmerman could have reasonably feared for his life and thereby justified in acting in self-defense.

Question: If Zimmerman is not racist, then why did he eye Martin and follow him as if he were a suspect?

Answer: In the days leading up to the tragic shooting of Martin, Zimmerman had reported several break-ins in his community to the police. The burglars were primarily young African American males. It so happened that Martin, too, was a young African American male. This was why Zimmerman became suspicious of him and followed him. Now, if the burglars were all Chinese men, then it would be a different story.

Imagine you have a vegetable garden. One night you saw a raccoon eating your plump tomatoes. You go out and chased it away. From now onward, you may eye every raccoon you see with suspicion, even when it is likely not the same raccoon that dined at your garden.

We have a tendency to suspect others of the same characteristics with the ones who have offended us in some way. When we suspect someone of something, every innocent gesture of theirs seems suspicious to us. This is among the unflattering traits of humanity. But then, some suspicion is healthy and helpful at times. For example, if a child in your community was kidnapped and the kidnapper was described as a bald white male, you might eye every bald white man you come across, and you might just catch the bad guy!

Hence, Zimmerman tailed Martin simply because he so happened to match the characteristics of the then-recent burglars who so happened to be primarily African American men. Other than this, there's no evidence to prove that Zimmerman is racist.

Question: What lessons should we learn from the account of Martin and Zimmerman?

Answer: I think we can learn at least three lessons from the tragedy:

a) Do not put yourself in a situation that you are not ordered to or have the capability to handle. If Zimmerman had listened to the dispatcher's advice to stay put, the tragedy would have been avoided.

b) We should not involve our emotions in judging a case. Our emotions can and do cloud our judgment. Rather, we should just focus on any evidence on hand. Only evidence can prove a case. Emotions do not, and will only get in our way.

c) We should not jump to conclusions without facts and evidences to support our claim. Would you want others to charge you with something when they do not have any proof to back it up but only had a "feeling" that you did it? If not, then do not do it to others. As Jesus said, "Whatever you desire for men to do to you, you shall also do to them; for this is the law and the prophets." (Matthew 7:12, WEB)

On a side note that you may find interesting: Four days after his acquittal, Zimmerman with a another man saved the lives of four people--two adults and two children--by rescuing them out of an overturned SUV that was catching fire by the time police arrived. Zimmerman also put out the fire with a fire extinguisher he so happened to have with him. The rescue site is less than a mile from the shooting of Martin. Will we dare stand on the side of truth and call Zimmerman a hero?


~*~Dr. Shirley's Corner~*~

Former CNN anchor Sharon Frame featured me in her latest book, "LeadHERship! Own It! Love it! Learn it! Give it!"

Are you caught up in life's "rat race" and adrift of your true purpose? Perhaps it's time to set a better sail. Sharon Frame's new and insightful book "LeadHERship" reveals the riveting life-stories of women who quit their empty, meaningless lives, or bucked the system to chart a new, more heart-centered course to happiness. 

One woman went from homeless to being a millionaire in no time! Another gave up her corporate job to go island-hopping and then moved to Tuscany, Italy, to live her dreams on a vineyard!

Through their daring moves, heart-aches and set-backs they discovered the four anchors of living a full life: Own it! Love It! Learn It! Give it!

In LeadHERship, we find women redefining wealth, health and happiness on their terms; with grace and authenticity. It points the way on how you can too.

This book is bound to help you "Lead Your Ship" and live with more clarity, confidence and conviction.

Grab a copy at:


May the grace and peace from Yahweh God and Jesus Christ be with you.!

Content Copyright by Dr. Shirley Cheng; All rights reserved

You are permitted to only give out or link to this website or post; all other distribution and copying is prohibited without the prior written permission of Dr. Shirley Cheng. Contact Shirley at

Would you like to receive Inspiration from a Blind via e-mail monthly? Then sign up at

Read previous issues of Inspiration from a Blind at

Best regards,

Dr. Shirley Cheng

Award-Winning Author with 27 Book Awards

Founder of Ultra-Ability Ministry

Proclaimer of Yahweh God's Good News of Salvation through Jesus Christ

Author/Contributor/Editor of 35 books by age 27, Bible Teacher, Poet, Motivational Speaker, Self-Empowerment Expert, Advocate

Board member of World Positive Thinkers Club

"Although I'm blind, I can see far and wide; even though I'm disabled, I can climb high mountains. Let the ropes of hope in Yahweh God haul you high!"

Please sign the Parental Rights in Children's Medical Care: Give Parents the Right to Say No Petition: